Posted by: James W. Spencer | February 13, 2012

Marriage Equality

Today, one day before Valentine’s Day, Washington’s Governor Christine Gregoire signed into law marriage equality in Washington State; the culmination of several months of work by a coalition of dedicated Washington organizations, but really decades of dedicated work by leaders in Washington’s LGBT community.

And while the spring and summer will likely be spent fighting the efforts of big religion to roll back marriage equality in Washington, all going well, the first state-sanctioned same-sex marriages may be taking place before the end of the year.

The big question is what does this mean for our many LGBT clients. Well, the status “marriage” in the State of Washington will add nothing else from a “rights” perspective as far as the State is concerned. As of 2009, all state-granted rights, incidents, and responsibilities conferred by marriage were also conferred by the state’s domestic partnership registry. The federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) still prevents the recognition of same-sex marriage at the federal level, and allows other states to ignore your Washington marriage. So little will change from a day-to-day rights perspective for our LGBT clients.

Wondering what to do if you are already domestically partnered? Purportedly (and I have yet to confirm), the law allows you two years to get a marriage license or dissolve your domestic partnership, after which time the State will automatically convert your domestic partnership to a marriage.

Aren’t registered and thinking about tying the knot? Of course we wish you the best in your nuptials, but would advise both you and your sweetie to educate yourselves on just what marriage or domestic partnership means. There are significant implications for real and personal property, income, benefits, and your federal income taxes to consider. With changes in both local and federal laws, we’re finding more and more clients opting in for some hardy estate planning, especially separate property agreements to shield them from unwanted tax consequences.

Of course, we’re always happy to chat, and our consultation is free. So don’t hesitate to give your favorite LGBT-owned law firm a call. We’ll be happy to explain it all, and let you know about options to protect yourself if you’re thinking about saying “I do”.

Posted by: James W. Spencer | November 23, 2011

TSLG Holiday Party

We hope you’ll be able to join us for the TSLG holiday party on December 14, 2011. Please R.S.V.P. to staff@thespencerlawgroup.com.

Posted by: James W. Spencer | November 14, 2011

Washington United for Marriage

On Sunday, Jim Brunner of the Seattle Times ran a story announcing Washington United for Marriage, a vast coalition of local organizations, congregations, unions and businesses working together to secure civil marriage for loving, committed gay and lesbian couples in 2012.

The Spencer Law Group PS is proud to be supporter and member of Washington United, because this issue is so important to protecting so many of our LGBT clients, and it is simply what is plain and fair for Washington State’s citizens.

Tell your friends and family about marriage equality and the growing coalition on facebook , twitter, and by sharing this post.

We hope youll attend a local Community Meeting on Marriage Equality, where you can learn about the Washington United for Marriage Coalition and how you can get involved. From Spokane to Gig Harbor, Vancouver to Bellingham, Washingtonians are making their voices heard.

Puyallup, WA
Monday, November 14
630 – 8:00 p.m.
First Christian Church of Puyallup
623 9th Ave.

Lakewood, WA
Tuesday, November 15
630 – 8:00 p.m.
Clover Park Tech College
4500 Steilacoom Blvd. SW

Vancouver, WA
Thursday, November 17
6:00 – 8:00 p.m.
YWCA Clark County
3609 Main St.

Gig Harbor, WA
Thursday, November 17
6:30 – 8:00 p.m.
United Methodist Church
7400 Pioneer Way

Seattle, WA
Sunday, November 20
3:00 – 5:00 p.m.
St. Mark’s Cathedral Bloedel Hall
1245 10th Ave. E

Bellevue, WA
Monday, November 21
7:00 – 9:00 p.m.
East Shore Unitarian Church
12700 Southeast 32nd St.

Richland, WA (Tri-Cities)
Monday, November 21
6:30 – 8:00 p.m.
Shalom United Church of Christ
505 McMurray St.    Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
Tuesday, November 22
6:30 – 8:00 p.m.
Spokane Falls Community College; Bldg. 24, Rm. 110
3410 W Fort George Wright Drive

Bellingham, WA
Tuesday, November 29
6:30 – 8:00 p.m.
Fairhaven College Auditorium
516 High St.

Posted by: James W. Spencer | November 9, 2011

Almost Equal: Protecting Same-Sex Families in Today’s Legal Patchwork

Please join The Spencer Law Group PS tomorrow for a presentation sponsored by the BECU Trust Company.

Posted by: James W. Spencer | November 9, 2011

A Shout Out to One of Our Clients

We wanted to take a moment to give a shout out to Arabic Lounge for their making Imbibe Magazine’s list of the 20 Best Coffee Shops in Seattle!

Says the magazine:

“This stunning Capitol Hill space has something for everybody: Chemex-brewed Stumptown coffee, an inventive brunch menu, a great selection of beer and wine, and a steady lineup of art and music events.”

If you haven’t been by to see this beautiful space, stop on by Arabica Lounge at 1550 East Olive Way on Seattle’s always-eclectic Capitol Hill.

Posted by: James W. Spencer | November 3, 2011

A Great Read for our Business Clients on SEO

I stumbled across this nice short article on Biznik.com this morning. It’s a great read for any of our business clients that maintain their own web site with the goal of increasing traffic to their business.

Content is King in the Land of SEO

Posted by: Lambros Politis | October 6, 2011

Amanda Knox My Socks Off…

Unless you have been living under a rock for the past year, as apparently I have been, then you have no doubt heard all about the Amanda Knox murder trial. I have taken it upon myself to provide some of my incisive commentary on this matter, and as always, have made it a point to infuse my opinions with the perfect amount of humor in an effort to make a profound impression on my readers (which for many of them results in indigestion, go figure).

As always, the views and opinions expressed in this blog article are those of the idiot author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Spencer Law Group, its attorneys, or any of its affiliates.

On the heels of the acquittal of Foxy Knoxy, my loyal followers have emerged in droves, (by the way I have come up with a new name for these die-hard minions–they will from this day forward be known as the “Megalo-Maniacs”) and have been begging me to comment on this scandal all week and provide some clarity and insights into the matter.

“You’re an all-wise, all-knowing, incredibly handsome estate planning lawyer, Lambros, what’s your take on all of this Amanda Knox hysteria, you know, from an attorney’s perspective?”

My response? “Huh? Amanda Knox? Who the f*** is that?” She the chick from That 70′s Show?”

*Silence*

*Lambros breaks wind*

*Laughter fills the room*

Megalo-Maniac No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “MM1″): “Uh no, Lambros, Amanda Knox is the young woman who was on trial for murdering a fellow foreign exchange student. Sire, she’s from Seattle…”

Lambros: “Oh…right…her. Okay, loyal follower, pop quiz, what were the events surrounding her arrest and subsequent acquittal? Obviously, I know, I just want to test you to make sure that you are as up-to-date on current events as your benevolent leader.”

MM1: “Well, Amanda was a foreign exchange student studying in Perugia, Italy; this attractive young American woman who went on an adventure in the Mediterranean for her junior year abroad, fell for a hot Italian boy and then ended up rooming with him and then in a sudden and unforeseeable turn of events, was accused, convicted and then exonerated on charges of murdering another young woman in a sex triangle gone awry. The prosecuting attorney accused her of participating in a “Pagan sex ritual” with the intended end result being the murder of this other woman and the press took the story and ran with it, making it more of a salacious tabloid cover story instead of reporting the facts in an accurate and objective way, as the media presumably has a duty to do.

Lambros, with righteous indignation syncopating in his voice: “The media is nothing more than a pawn of Rubert Murdock’s; doing his bidding and used to promote his own interests! “

MM1, completely ignoring his master’s unsolicited social commentary continues, “they painted a portrait of her as a coquettish, blood-thirsty femme fatale whose only real motivation was to lure in this other young woman so that after she was through using her to promote her own ravenous sexual needs, she would discard her by slitting her throat, and bleeding her like a stuck pig in order to satiate her blood-lust. But Knox doesn’t come to mind as one of the usual suspects for such a case. Her roommate, the victim, Meredith Kercher, a British exchange student, was found on the night after Halloween in 2007, raped, throat slit in the apartment the two women shared. According to the European Council, 1 in 5 European women are victims of sexual assault at some point in their lives. 98% of their aggressors are men…”

Lambros: “Pagan sex rituals? Coquettish? Is she hot? I mean, er, where can one find an image of her, I’d like to put a face to this tale of injustice?”

MM1: “Google?”

*Lambros googles Amanda Knox and instead gets an image of Haiden Panettiere where she appears to be getting wasted at a P Diddy White Party* Eyes bulging out of his fat, bald head, he blurts out, “Damn. Nice–I mean, look at this poor broken woman, you can tell from the look on her face that she has been through hell and back.” Lambros furtively saves the image on his smart phone. “So anyways, my loyal servant, tell me, what were some of the affronts to justice committed by the Italian authorities in handling this matter?”

MM1: “Well, for starters the lead prosecuting attorney on the case had really screwed the pooch in his last high profile murder case by pinning it on the wrong guy and was desperate for redepmtion in the eyes of the public–and Amanda Knox was going to be his vehicle on that path to vindication, instead it quickly became apparent that she was nothing more than a sacrificial lamb in helping to wipe away the memory of his most recent prosecutorial gaffe.”

Lambros: “Yes, lambs and giraffes. Continue. You hungry by the way? Would you like a Twinkie, I have two of them and am willing to share.”

MM1 shakes his head “no” and continues relaying the events surrounding the case, “anyhow, the authorities told her to sign a confession written in Italian that she couldn’t understand, and refused to allow her access to legal representation, or even a translator, for that matter.”

Lambros, with a mouthful of cake and cream filling, “That’s brutal, apple strudel. Chomp chomp nom nom. If this were America, chomp nom nom, that would be a violation of her Sixth Amendment rights, or something, chomp nom nom.”

MM1: “As if that wasn’t bad enough, in an effort to break her spirits, the prosecutor and his loyal goons administered a blood test and then lied to her and told her that she had been infected with the HIV virus.”

“What!” Lambros exlaimed, spitting the half-eaten twinkie all over the disciple’s face, “okay, now that is just messed up beyond all recognition! That has to be a violation of at least one of the articles of the Geneva Conventions or a crime against humanity, or something exposing the Italian authorities to international law liability.”

MM1: “It gets worse, Master Lambros,” (rolls eyes) “the murder weapon was a kitchen knife and according to the forensics experts had some of Knox’s DNA on it. Which in and of itself is not a smoking gun pinning her to the murder. Who knows, maybe she used the knife earlier that day to slice a sandwich in half or a panini, or whatever it is they eat in Italy. Moreover, they reportedly found traces of her lover’s DNA on the knife as well. After international experts had been called in to verify the findings of the Italian investigators, they discovered that the traces of his DNA they found on the knife, were in fact nothing more than crumbs from a pound cake.”

Outraged, Lambros shouts, “pound cake?!? pound cake?!? Okay wrap this up for me, what happened next?”

Wiping the crumbs and spittle off of his disgraced visage, MM1 responded, “Rudy Guede, the fourth member of the gruesome foursome was tried for murder and sexual assault and was found guilty and sentenced to 30 years in prison. The court found that his version of the events didn’t match the forensic evidence, remarking that he was unable to explain why one of his palm prints, stained with the victims blood, had been found on the pillow of the bed under the naked body of the victim, after he had claimed that he left her fully dressed. In December of ’09, the court of appeals upheld his convictions, but reduced his sentence to 16 years, explaining that he was the only one to apologize to the Kercher family for his failure to come to her rescue.”

Lambros: “Hmm, ain’t that some shit, well, I’ll be… I wonder who is handling her probate matter?”

Posted by: James W. Spencer | October 6, 2011

Tips from an Almost Client for Success in Small Claims Court

I probably have more almost clients than clients. That is, people with legal needs make their way to me, by referral from a friend or attorney co-hort, and when they are that close to hiring me, I tell them they just don’t need to spend the money on a lawyer. I recognize that this sounds counter-intuitive coming from an attorney, but it’s the God’s-honest truth. I would much prefer to gently guide someone to sources for self-help, and hope that those savings they realize get returned to me when they really do need an attorney.

All that said, it is rare that I get a great e-mail like the one I received this week from a recent almost client. With almost client’s permission, I am sharing her story and her email here since I think it is helpful for all of my clients, prospective clients, and almost clients who are looking at voluntarily or involuntarily availing themselves of small claims court. The names, dates and locations have been changed to protect Almost Client’s privacy, but I otherwise have left the letter intact.

A little background: Almost Client moved out of her rented home, and her landlord attempted to withhold her deposit for a variety of specious claims. I discussed the Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of Washington State with Almost, and agreed to review her letter to the landlord seeking a refund of her deposit as a courtesy. Last I’d heard from Almost, the landlord actually filed suit in small claims court to recover amounts above and beyond the deposit, a highly unusual activity even for the nastiest of landlords….

Dear James,

I just wanted to let you know that I went to small claims court for my security deposit refund, and I won!!  My ex-landlord actually ended up suing me in small claims court, as soon as she received my letter of Smarch 12th (the one you reviewed for me).  I decided to counter-sue (and was very glad that I did).  You see, I was initially very confused by the fact that she filed suit in two courts, both Shelbyville and Springfield, and there were two separate court dates for the exact same case.  However, I decided to counter-sue in Shelbyville, which was where the earlier of the court dates was scheduled.  When I went to file my counter, the clerk immediately realized that it was a double-filing, and moved the later hearing in Springfield to the same date, time and location as the Shelbyville hearing.  So our court date was last Monday, Smarch 30th, in Shelbyville.  The judge did not issue a ruling on the spot, but said he needed time to review both of our exhibits.  I received the ruling by mail this past Saturday, Noctember 1st.

Aside from the fact that I think the landlord’s charges were completely unwarranted and just plain wrong, I attribute my success to advice I received from you (thank you!), and from a free legal clinic that I visited, and the fact that I was very prepared.  My spouse has experience with small claims court, and she helped me to prepare my exhibits and she listened to me practice my spiel many times.  If I were to give anyone else advice about this process, based upon my experience, this is what I would say:

1.  Do NOT forget to bring proof of service to the other party to the hearing!  (I didn’t know this, and my spouse had to run back to our house to get it on the day of the hearing, but fortunately we were last on the docket, so it was fine)

2.  Stick to the point and do not ramble on about anything other than why you don’t owe the money/are owed the money.  I saw the judge admonish people in other cases for going off the point.  Make sure your exhibits are listed in the same order that you’re going to speak about them, so it’s easy for the judge to follow along.

3.  If you are the defendant and feel that you are the one who is actually owed money, be absolutely sure to countersue.  The way the judge sets it up for people to talk is:  first plaintiff, then defendant, then plaintiff has a chance to say the last word.  However, since the countersuer is also a plaintiff of sorts, the countersuer gets the last-last word.  This ended up being helpful to me, as I was able to address something that the plaintiff threw out there in her “last word”.

4.  Your advice about appearing reasonable was extremely helpful.  I went over and over what I was asking for, what I was agreeing to, etc to be sure that I was appearing reasonable.  I believe this helped me tremendously, because the landlords could not prove their case and ended up appearing unreasonable.

Anyway, thank you again so much for your help…I really appreciate it.

Regards,

-Almost Client

My thanks to Almost for letting me share her experience, and congratulations to her for prevailing. The tips she provided for small claims court are invaluable, and I know if you found your way here on the Interwebs, you appreciate them as much as I do.

Posted by: James W. Spencer | September 23, 2011

Fall 2011 E-Newsletter


Featured TSLG Business Client: True Love Holdings LLC

Are you looking for true love? Well look no further.

Welcome to the True Love Art Gallery – a space exhibiting eclectic artwork, at a moderate price, with an excessively welcoming atmosphere to boot. But wait…it gets better. Not only can you peruse the artwork, but these folks provide an exceptional tattoo service as well! This affable group of guys created the perfect space for art-loving Seattleites to find something “unique, beautiful, and weird,” in the heart of Capitol Hill.

In combination with the master builder, Stu Hidalgo, the trio [Boris Erickson, Mick Gilmore, and George Long] set out to offer an inspiring locale, where people can meander, buy art, or opt for a one-of-a-kind tattoo. As defined by Boris, “It’s art. It’s tattoos. It’s love. It’s community. It can be edgy, adventurous, peaceful, and mellow all at once.” The space is clean and open, unassuming and unpretentious. It’s open to all walks of life. You’ll find no flash, generic tattoo prints on the walls. Everything is custom catered to the individual.

So if you’re looking for something genuine, whether it be art, a tattoo, or – yes, I’m going there – true love, then check out this gem on Capitol Hill.

For more info on True Love:

facebook.com/trueloveart

www.trueloveart.com

1525 Summit Avenue, Seattle, WA 98122

The Spencer Law Group ps represents some of Seattle’s coolest businesses. If you’re a client and would like your business to be featured, please contact us!


Like Us? Share the Love!

Our clients often ask how they can share the good work that we do. Since we’re pretty bad at tooting our own horn, here’s a few ways you can show the love. We thank you in advance for taking some time to share your experiences with TSLG with your friends, family, and the public at large!

1. Write a review of our firm on Yelp.com.

2. Like us on Facebook.

3. Rate our attorneys on the rating site Avvo.com by clicking on their profile here:

James Spencer

Jared Brickey

Lambros Politis

Lukas Dudkowski

4. Recommend our estate planning, business, probate, trademark and copyright services to your friends and family.


TLSG News: Aloha to Jared Brickey, Prix Fix Legal, Goodbye to the 3% Admin Fee, and Hourly Rate Changes

First, we want to say a fond “aloha” to TSLG attorney Jared Brickey. Jared leaves The Spencer Law Group ps on September 30th for an opportunity to practice in Maui. We wish Jared the best of luck and thank him for his service here at the firm!

As you know, The Spencer Law Group PS works hard to maximize our clients’ dollar. We believe that the more efficient we are with your hard-earned dinero, the more likely it is that you’ll come back to let us serve your future legal needs.

With that philosophy in mind, starting in October TSLG will offer its clients its new “Prix Fix Legal” payment option on our most common client matters in estate planning & business representation. In most of these cases, clients can choose between a fixed price for their legal matter, or pay at our regular hourly rate. Your attorney will discuss this with you during your free consultation, so if you’re in the market for some legal work, call or email us today about this great new pricing program.

Because we know that in this economy every penny counts, starting October 1 TSLG will no longer collect a 3% administrative fee on client matters. This fee was collected to offset the costs of day-to-day photocopying, postage, and other incidental expenses related to our clients’ representation. Instead, clients will be billed at cost for larger postage and photocopying/scanning projects. As always, consult with your attorney if you have questions about what you’ll be charged for.

Finally, to simplify our rate structure, all regular hourly rates will be standardized effective October 1, 2011. Attorneys Lukas Dudkowski & Lambros Politis will be billed at a regular rate of $220/hour, and attorney James Spencer will be billed at $280/hour. Administrative staff will continue to be billed at $95/hour. TSLG also continues to be a network provider under the ARAG legal plan.

We believe we have some of the most competitive rates in the business, particularly in light of our commitment to effectively and efficiently representing our clients. All of us here at The Spencer Law Group ps are grateful for your business, and we look forward to continuing to provide value to the great people for whom we work.


The Spencer Law Group ps

The Spencer Law Group ps generates this e-newsletter quarterly to help keep its clients and professional contacts up-to-date about the goings-on at the firm. We hope you find this information useful. If at any time you have concerns about the content of this e-newsletter, or would like to be removed from future mailings, please don’t hesitate to email us at admin@thespencerlawgroup.com.

© 2011 The Spencer Law Group ps

1809 7th Avenue, Suite 1410, Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 420-4567

www.thespencerlawgroup.com

Posted by: Lambros Politis | September 15, 2011

Lawyers Strip to Pay Off Student Loans

Oh happy day! Christmas certainly came early this year for one irreverent Greek attorney–I get to blog about weird sex laws AND lawyers turned strippers in the same week, it truly does not get any better than this. Time for me to turn this profession on its head a bit; so stuffy and austere we are as attorneys, the legal system needs an enema, and I am just the one to administer it–lighten up, counselor, relax, have some guac and enjoy the show. I realize that this is our firm blog and is to be used as a way to disseminate information related to estate planning and business law; however, it would appear as though I have availed myself of (hijacked) this blogsite as a way of proliferating my own ideological biases while corrupting the minds of my loyal followers.  Sorry dad :( The following is an excerpt from the following link courtesy of MSNBC:  http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/09/12/7730301-lawyer-turns-topless-dancer-to-pay-the-bills.

“When Carla graduated 10 years ago, she thought her law degree would be a permanent ticket to a high-paying job.  But instead of selling her mind, Carla is selling her body. After student loans, debt, a layoff and unemployment battered her bank account, she now finds herself in an almost unbelievable position – dancing in a topless bar.

“Did I ever think I’d be taking my top off for rent money? No. I was in my mid-30s and had never danced before,” said Carla, who asked that we use her stage name and withhold her identity and some personal details. “As a little girl, I never thought to myself, ‘I just want to grow up and be a stripper,’ or, ‘All I ever wanted to do in life is climb in the lap of sweaty stranger and take my top off.”

No shame, Carla, none whatsoever. If I could stand the sight of my own naked body and thought that people would be willing to pay me to disrobe for them in exchange for money, I would certainly consider a career as a male exotic dancer. I would rock that banana hammock like a hurricane. I even have a stage name picked out should I ever decide to invest in spray tanning, laser hair removal, and a cycle of steroids with an eye towards re-inventing myself as a dancer, “Grecian Thunder Down Under.” Nice right? Clever and has a nice ring to it. “Ladies get your coin purses ready for the incomparable, the incorrigible, the irresistible, Grecian Thunder Down Under!” But I digress…

“Carla, stage three, Carla your presence is required on stage three, now!” You know what? Good for her. I don’t want to hear any nonsense about the objectification and degradation of women parading naked on stage from people who have never once set foot in a gentleman’s club? (The following will no doubt elicit the ire of a handful hypersensitive bra-burning femi-nazis.) The truth of the matter is that, it’s not the girls who are being objectified; it’s the sorry saps who are emotionally ill-equipped to experience love in their personal lives and must resort to pay for affection in whatever form that may be, they are the ones being exploited, both financially and emotionally. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen these pathetic dolts stumble back to their seats after a lap dance, punch drunk off of love, muttering, “I think I’m in love,” only to be crushed when they catch a glimpse of the object of their desire sitting on someone else’s lap two minutes later. Think you’re in love, huh? Well, I happen to think you’re broke because that young lady just drained your bank account and still has no clue what your name is. That said, I will readily acknowledge that SOME impressionable young women are nefariously lured into a life of stripping only to be exploited and then confronted with issues of drug abuse, prostitution, and alcoholism as a way of coping with the shame and disgust associated with this seedy (under)world of adult entertainment. However, just as many dancers are willing and knowing participants and are not relegated to a position of powerlessness.

You mean to tell me that poor Carla invested close to $140K in her law school degree only to graduate and be confronted with the worst economic period since the great depression? Newsflash people, the number of jobs in the legal field is shrinking while the salaries are declining at an alarming rate courtesy of an economy that has ground to a screeching halt. Lesson to all of the young bright-eyed crusaders of justice, people just like Carla, who believe that by acquiring your J.D. you will finally be able to champion the cause of the disenfranchised and the marginalized members of society–wake up! It’s not happening! Chances are you won’t even be able to find a good-paying legal job right out of law school in the first instance, let alone an impactful job that will afford you the opportunity to argue in front of a judge to effect change in a positive and meaningful way for the masses! And by good-paying job, I mean a job that pays enough to allow you to pay your formidable monthly student debt bill on time and yet still leave you with enough disposable income to perhaps purchase a crappy condo in the burbs? Presumably, that’s the other reason you decided to go to law school right, so you could make a little cash and at least flirt with the idea of being in a higher tax bracket? Carla’s ticket to financial freedom comes in the form of a lap dance. This is what it has come to.

But the truth of the matter is that unless Carla has law review credentials, is ranked near the top of her class, or it says Harvard or Yale on her diploma, there is really no place for her in the upper echelon of this profession. In light of all that, all of a sudden a career as a stripper seems plausible. So ladies, if you are having a hard time finding a decent paying job that affords you the ability to pay your student loans without draining the piggy bank, then dust off those six inch stilettos and g-strings, and try your hand at moonlighting as an exotic dancer–you certainly won’t catch any flak from me, as a matter of fact, if you market your sexy lawyer/stripper persona right, I might just be your best paying customer. That begs the question, what is Carla’s hourly billing rate?

In the alternative, my advice, if you are smart enough and have the drive and dedication to make it through law school, try your hand at a different career path altogether. Perhaps med school or dentistry? Oh wait, you got a D – in organic chemistry, so that’s out of the question. Open up a business or perhaps go into consulting or public relations, any job that requires critical thinking and good analytical skills will likely suit you well if you are “legally inclined.” Or, if all else fails, just do like Carla did and shake you money maker until you are law school debt-free. You know what really grinds my gears, it’s that law schools are failing to warn these recent college grads of just how dire the circumstances are, and schools are not only doing them a disservice, but really doing the profession as whole a disservice given the deleterious impact this glut of lawyers has had on the profession. Infuriating. If I had it to do all over again, and I knew then what I know now, I would have never submitted my application to the admissions office.

It is a mammoth investment that may never pay off in the end. Keep that in mind when sending in those expensive law school applications. And if you are still not convinced that law school might not be the best option for you, then please watch the video below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMvARy0lBLE

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.